Epic Moments

In human life, there are moments which we can term ‘epic’. I will give here some examples of these moments, and will elaborate why I call these moments epic. 

Gandhi was thrown out of the train at Pietermaritzburg. The young man took a pledge that he will fight injustice. Non-violence will be his weapon.

Gautama was walking in a garden. He saw a sick man, an old man and a corpse. He took the pledge of renunciation and became Buddha. 

Archimedes jumped into a bathtub. He discovered the principle of buoyancy. 

An apple fell on the head of Newton. He discovered the law of gravitation. 

These are some of the examples of what I call epic moments. We have many such examples. 

We read about these events, giving rise to epic moments. One can argue and juxtapose whether another person, other than the persons described in the above examples, could have the same experience, same impact, with same consequences had he experienced the same event. The answer we do not know. But we ‘know’ these events, how they produced epic moments and how they changed the course of history, philosophy, science and human life. 

Let us forget for a moment these events. We are all human beings. Our life practices are almost same – we eat, sleep, we need family, friends, and comfort and so on. These elements too had a place among the lives of above individuals.

But what made them different from us? Is it time? Is it space? Is it the particular age in which they were born? Perhaps not. The epic moments I described above transcend time and space. Their consequences transcend age, transcend physical human phenomenon. All these persons lived like us. They spoke, lived and behaved like us. But, all are dead and gone. What does remain? Those epic moments remain, their impacts remain. Because of those epic moments, and their consequences, we remember these people.

So, we have the answer – what makes them different from us. The answer is – epic moments. It is these moments that separate them from us. Events occurred to them, created an epic moment for them, and we know that, and we remember them. 

How is an epic moment produced? It is difficult to answer. The events described, and which gave rise to epic moments, are very ordinary events. That can possibly happen to any individual. They are events that produced epic moments. It is not the event per se that is important, but it is the person, his/her state of mind, the exact situation, the circumstances surrounding the event, the social mores of the time, the receptivity of the individual at that time – all help constitute an epic moment. In another way, it is the combination of acts and forces happening in a particular time and place, but not in the control of that particular person, who is experiencing that particular event. Again I emphasize, the event may be ordinary, but when it gives rise to an epic moment, its significance passes beyond that particular person, time and space. 

I further argue that in every individual’s life there are epic moments. Perhaps the scales are different, but nonetheless there are epic moments in every individual’s life. An event causing a sudden moment of realization, an intimation of something deep, invoking in us something noble, or loosening the grip of mind and heart towards something wider, can give rise to an epic moment. An epic moment can emerge from any event, even from a very mundane event such as watching an animal walking, or a bird flying, or water flowing, or watching a person speaking some particular words, or watching a song or a play. Epic moments create life changing waves in us. They inspire us, change our lives, and make us a different human being than we were before. It was, I would say, a kind of reincarnation or rebirth, but in the same body.

There is another angle. A human being on average lives about 60 or 70 or 80 years, or may be more or less. The human life is very ordinary. It is indeed very ordinary. Society and law have set before us certain rules, which guide our lives. We do our daily chores, do our work for sustenance, have family, friends, and so on. And life passes away. In that sense, human life is very ordinary.

What makes life extraordinary? What brings to it meaning? Epic moments. Minus epic moments, the whole life possesses not much value. Epic moments inspire our life, shape our life. Like non-violence shaped the life of Gandhi, or renunciation shaped the life of Buddha, and so on. To add, the ordinary human life becomes extraordinary due to epic moments. If a human being is seized by an epic moment, clings to it, and follows it, his life becomes different than the others. His life becomes extraordinary. 

I will make a distinction here. Are all events epic? No. Can an event which is ordinary for an individual be epic for another individual? Yes. Who will define whether an event is epic or not? First, the individual, then the society. Rather the impact of an epic moment on an individual is so powerful, so immense, it flows out towards society. It is the society that remembers, reinvigorates the epic moment that happened to the individual, even long after the individual is dead and gone. 

In a different context, Max Weber wrote ideas come to us when they please, not when we please. It has a deeper meaning, which I can apply to the analysis of epic moments. Epic moments occur when they please, not when we please. But, again, there is a qualification here. There may be exceptions. The general rule is the individual must be receptive to the epic moment. There must be preparedness somewhere. Individual must be able to capture the energy released by the epic moment, and channelize it. It was like the apple that fell on the head of Newton, and activated his fertile brain, toward the discovery of law of gravity. 

Epic moments are ‘epic’ moments. They are not ordinary moments. Hence, it is not under the control of a particular individual to make an epic moment happen. As I mentioned earlier, there is probably scales in epic moments. An epic moment that changes human life, revolutionizes science, creates new paradigms are not the same epic moment that begins in an individual’s life and ends there. Both are, however, epic in terms of transformative power, whether small or large, individual or group or larger society. An individual may have experienced an epic moment and guided by it in his own life and is not interested to widen or to channel the transformative power to other individuals in society. But, it will still remain an epic moment as it transformed the life of that individual.

Are there negative and positive epic moments? This is very difficult to answer. I may appear biased if I say that epic moments have a positive transformative power on society. I may be wrong.

Philosophy of Life: Some Propositions

What is philosophy of life? The answer is uncertain. There is no single answer. It is like entering an ocean of debates; the end result being the beginning of the ocean. My argument against this will be human life can not survive in a vacuum. There needs to be debate and discussion, this is what makes the human being rational. It will be safe to argue that every individual has his own philosophy of life. It may also be safe to argue that philosophy of life changes from place to place, from situation to situation and from time to time. In my philosophy of life, I have the following propositions.

The first proposition is individual is fragile. However a strong and determined a person may be, there must be moments in his life when his determination melts, or he breaks down or feels weak. At the death of his wife, Kasturba, Gandhi bemoaned, “After sixty years of constant companionship, I cannot imagine life without her.” You can call it a sign of emotional chord that Gandhi struck at the loss of Kasturba but it shows the softer side of Gandhi who was otherwise considered a strong willed person who sat on fast for weeks together and fought non-violently the mighty British. I can give many examples. The great scholar and one of the founders of modern sociology, Emile Durkheim was devastated at his son’s death and this hastened his death. This fragility comes in many shapes – physical, emotional, moral, etc.

The second proposition is individual’s thinking and actions are molded by circumstances. No genius now says that a time will come when there will be flying machines as Roger Bacon had said centuries ago. We just fly. We do not think about travelling faster in aero planes, we just travel in them. We are no more worried about how to light our home as electricity is a quotidian thing. This was not the case hundred and some years ago. One of my friends in Minneapolis narrated how the older generations were confronting cold as they had to go outside their houses to attend nature’s call in minus twenty five degree Fahrenheit temperature and how they had to keep fire burning so that their house can be warm. These are now the past. These are some of the examples in collective life of the individuals. Even an individual’s personal thinking and behavior changes due to circumstances. Circumstances sometimes force an individual to do an act which he could not have otherwise done. We know extreme cases how an individual commits a serious crime, which he repents later. When I say circumstances I include these factors: individual’s state of mind at a given time, his place and status in society, his current location and the time, and his perception of laws and mores.

The third proposition is there is something in individual life which is not always in his control. You may call it fate or destiny. There is such an element in human life. The fate may include a eureka moment as in case of Archimedes or an apple falling on Newton’s head. One element brings these disparate incidents together is in none of these cases the person expected that particular incident will happen. I am not saying they are same. What I am trying to allude is the reward may not be always correspondent to a person’s work, the reverse maybe true. Shakespeare had said that some have greatness thrust upon them. I will give an Indian example. During choice of candidates for presidential elections in India in 2007, the ruling Congress party chose Karan Singh, one of the able candidates for the post. One of the coalition partners of the Congress, the Communist Party vetoed it arguing that Singh belongs to a royal family, and his aristocratic upbringing and his views on religion may not be suitable to the post. They proposed another candidate Pratibha Patil, who was a classmate of a communist leader. Patil was elected President.  

The fourth proposition is the most workable philosophy of life is inclusivism. A narrow minded person always finds faults in others and indulges in blame game. To add, a self-centered philosophy is not a better philosophy of life. I do not deny the importance of self, but there is a limit. I also believe in the dictum: a person who does not know how to help him can not help others. I am trying to extend the argument further. Gandhi comes here as an ideal. For him, all religions are like different rivers flowing to a sea or like beautiful flowers in a garden. For him, divisions on the basis of caste, color, religion, country are man made and they do not stand rational scrutiny. A person believing in inclusivism when sees a problem will first ask: how far am I responsible for this? How much have I contributed to this problem? How much can I help to resolve it? He will respect different views, different ways of life, though not necessarily succumbing to them. He will learn from others. To quote Gandhi, learn as if you are a student whole life.

The fifth proposition is humility is a greater asset than arrogance. I believe in the Socratic saying, ‘I know that I do not know.’ It is true that more an individual learns he becomes more humble. Swami Vivekananda articulated this proposition very well with the simile of well-frog. The frog living in the well can not see beyond the well. For the frog, the well is the universe, and there is nothing beyond that. A frog from outside fell down in the well. The well-frog asked the outsider: is your home bigger than this? The frog from outside said the outside world is too big, there is no comparison. The well-frog insisted that there can be nothing bigger than the well. The point I am trying to make is a person who wants to learn more must be humble; an arrogant person closes his mind for new knowledge.

I will stop for now. I will add few more propositions later. Perhaps the sixth one will be: simple living and high thinking. There is no end to human need; hence the better thing to do is to minimize the needs. I do not disagree with Aristotle that a person needs comfort and time to have useful reflections. But one has to find out ways how to find one’s comfort in such a way as to put minimal burden on nature and earth. The seventh proposition will be: one must contribute to society. I believe the society is our larger self. One needs to contribute to society in his own capability. A person who has no food needs to be busy to find means of subsistence. But a person who has no such worry should contribute to society.